Acme vs omega

Though the companies were similar as they produced digital microprocessors and circuit boards, they differed in terms of the management. The workers were pleased with their work. Acme managed to get the contract to manufacture the photocopier after it reduced its production cost.

Hence, Omega was effective because of the strategy it used to accomplish its goals Daft, Overall, Omega was more effective as the company managed to produce units that had no defects before the Acme vs omega was split.

Team work is vital in the organization as it enables the employees attain the organizational goals. This ensured the company did not produce defective units like Acme. Employees from the departments were not allowed to meet and discuss the production of the photocopier Daft, Acme encouraged every department to work alone and also employees to work individually and thus affected the quality of products they produced.

Recent Topics

Acme and Omega electronics. The managers at Acme had a detailed organizational chart and comprehensive job descriptions. Therefore, Omega was effective in producing the prototype not because of the Acme vs omega the managers selected, but the strategies used to achieve the goals.

Cengage Learning Last modified on Tuesday, 21 May Alternatively, Omega did not have an organizational chart as the managers felt that the organization was small. Also, the companies wanted to remain profitable and competed for the profitable contracts.

This forced the photocopier company to split the contract between the two companies and encouraged them to reduce the defects and cost Daft, Organizations that encourage team work perform better than those which do not. The company that got the final contract was Acme.

The companies were to be achieved using different strategies depending on the company. The kind of management and leadership styles the managers used to lead the organizations affected the accomplishment of the goals Daft, The managers believed that the organizational charts put barriers between specialists and workers as they were unable to work together.

Conversely, the Acme managers ensured each department worked alone to manufacture the photocopiers. Team work was the main strategy the company used to ensure the prototypes produced were effective.

Tyler argued that having clear responsibilities and well defined jobs will improve the performance of the organization and profitability. Organizational theory and design. The Omega managers ensured the employees and all the departments worked together to produce the photocopier as per the contract and increase profitability.

Acme became successful after the contract was split and after cutting the production cost. As a result the companies competed for the same contracts in order to grow and expand. The top managers had an impact on the goals as they determined whether the goals will accomplish the goals or not.

Omega will produce the best results as the employees in the organization work as a team. The managers encouraged employees to work together and ensured the workers were conversant with all the activities in the organization. For example, the photocopier company was happy with the reduction of cost and offered Acme the contract.

In this case, employees and departments in omega were encouraged to work as a team when producing the photocopiers.

These ensured workers were able to work in different areas.After reading the case of the “Paradoxical Twins Acme and Omega Electronics”, I Acme vs omega Both Acme and Omega produce similar products and offer similar services.

Acme president John Tyler is a very tough going individual and he is portrayed to be an autocratic individual because there is one way. The wealth and variety of management models can certainly be confusing.

From mechanistic management process to organic management process, each system has its own strengths and weaknesses in competition with each other. According to Burns and Stalker, when the external environment was stable, the 4/4(3).

Acme and Omega Acme and Omega had common goals as they wanted to grow in future and expand. As a result the companies competed for the same contracts in order to grow and expand. Also, the companies wanted to remain profitable and competed for the profitable contracts.

For instance, the companies were awarded a contract to develop. Acme and Omega Electronics Using the mechanistic and organic structure arguments develop in Chapter 2, compare and contrast the management styles at Acme and Omega. Free Essay: Acme and Omega Electronics Using the mechanistic and organic structure arguments develop in Chapter 2, compare and contrast the management styles.

Acme and Omega Electronics Using the mechanistic and organic structure arguments develop in Chapter 2, compare and contrast the management styles at Acme and Omega. Acme's managerial style consists of a mechanistic structure, while Omega's managerial style is based on an organic structure.

Download
Acme vs omega
Rated 0/5 based on 62 review